Fishing tips, Angling TrustNovember 12, 2009 10:23 pm

Gold wrapped Christmas gift for the angler in your life
Image credit: Broken-Arts

Are you looking for the ideal Chistmas gift for a friend or relative who fishes? Tackle is a difficult choice as it can be very much a personal preference and buying an item of tackle that the angler already has can be embarassing (let’s be frank, I don’t even know what I’ve already got…).

So why not buy a year’s membership to the Angling Trust! This is the new, single organisation to represent all game, coarse and sea anglers in England. They will lobby government, campaign on environmental and angling issues and run national and international competitions. They will increase participation in angling by people of all ages and backgrounds. They will fight pollution, commercial over-fishing at sea, over-abstraction, poaching, unlawful navigation, local bans and a host of other threats to angling. You will not only show that you are thinking about them at the festive season but you will be helping them to make a real contribution to the sport that they love and helping the Angling trust at the same time. Any angler worth his salt should be a member.An excellent gift for the new angler as it will get them involved in their first angling community and give them a feeling of belonging.

Members get the following benefits all for just twenty pounds a year, the ideal present for any angler and if you pay by direct debit then the gift will be renewed each year. One less present to worry about each Christmas!

Menbership applications are here.

The trust says

The Angling Trust is here to represent you and to ensure the future of our sport. Help us to help you, stand up and be counted, join today. You can support the Angling Trust for less than 39p a week and get several great member benefits. Your subscription is important, it will make your voice heard. The more anglers who join, the louder our voice and the more we will achieve - for you the angler.

If you'd like to leave a comment on this post, here's how.

Angling TrustOctober 25, 2009 10:17 pm

At the end of August I wrote a post about how our chance to get all anglers speaking with one voice was likely to fail with disastrous effects to the future of our sport. It made depressing reading and I apologise for that, but the one glimmer of hope in the whole post was a letter from a group that has now become known as the Magnificent Seven and I make no apologies for republishing it here.

The following letter was recently sent to the Trust and gives us a glimmer of hope:

OPEN LETTER DATED AUGUST 10th 2009
ADDRESSED TO BOARD OF THE ANGLING TRUST

Dear Sirs

It is with deepest concern that we contact you regarding the development of the Angling Trust.

For far too long, anglers have needed a professionally run, representative body, and the launch of the Angling Trust in January 2009 was a major step forward towards greater unity in angling.

We believe the Angling Trust has provided an initial framework to the path of true representation and the merging board has created a valuable structure, but news of overspending combined with a failing business plan is extremely worrying although not that surprising.

Our concerns at this stage arise primarily from the continuing lack of engagement with AT members, and the angling community as a whole, particularly on sensitive issues. There is a wealth of first hand angling, industry and media experience that appears to have been largely ignored by the current board. Therefore, it is with this in mind, that we all offer our support services, without charge, to the Angling Trust as a “collective” advisory board. The absence of individuals that anglers recognise, trust and respect is clearly apparent at all levels of the Angling Trust.

In addition, there is obviously and immediate need to review the failing business plan currently in place. Once again, where applicable, we would like to offer our experience in business development, marketing and finance at no cost, to help secure the immediate continuation and sustainable development of the Angling Trust in the future.

We trust that the current AT board will be addressing these concerns and await your earliest response.

Signed by:

John Wilson, Keith Arthur, Danny Fairbrass, Martin Bowler, Ruth Lockwood, John Everard, Tim Norman

This group - who I will in future refer to as the M7 - are all very busy people and it was decided that an advisory panel of fifteen anglers from all disciplines, under the chairmanship of John Wilson, was needed to spread the workload. I needed to be on that panel so I started to make representations to everyone I could think of. I made a list of ideas collected from many sources and I understand this was referred to on the first meeting of the M7.
(more…)

If you'd like to leave a comment on this post, here's how.

Angling TrustAugust 29, 2009 3:12 pm

I am an old man, 60 seasons have come and gone since I was stocked into the fishery that is this world of ours and I like to think that I may have picked up a little wisdom during all that time. Very little of this was free, indeed I paid quite heavily for a lot of it but I will pass one particular gem on to you for nothing.

All you anglers (and many non anglers) are worriers and are always ready to complain about what ever it is that worries you. Get a couple of anglers together and the complaints will start - the immigrants/cormorants/crayfish are eating all our fish, there are too many/not enough silver fish or carp, or the carp in such and such place are dying from some disease or other. The list is endless.

I was once told by a man I respected greatly, in an organisation whose initials are AA and has nothing to do with motoring, that worries should be dealt with in the following way. He said,“There are two categories of things that people worry about: things that they can do nothing about, in which case, why worry about them and things they can do something about, in which case, stop worrying about them and do something to solve the problem.” I have tried to follow this axim over the last few years and whilst it has not stopped me worrying it has given me a measure of “peace of mind”.

It is a difficult way to live, it is so much easier to complain about the way things are and how someone should do something rather than get your bum off your seatbox and actually do something or empower someone who has the required skills to force some change or other.

I pointed out to my readers their chance to take such action in my post on the 18th January about the formation of the new Angling Trust and I said all anglers needed to join this organisation to give us a combined voice to protect the future of our sport.

Well, the majority of the apathetic anglers in this country didn’t bother to put their hands in their pockets and join because someone else would do it and everything would be alright! Now we are in danger of losing our last chance, we have burned our boats by combining all the failing angling groups into one and that is about to fail too. Not because of political pressure or the difficulty of the task but purely because Joe Angling Public could not be bothered and didn’t care enough about the future of his/her sport. Neither did the tackle trade or the clubs or the Angling Press, every one just thought they didn’t need to get involved someone else would do it for them.

Perhaps I am being unfair, maybe the launch of the Angling Trust and its purpose and value to the sport was not well publicised but in a number of my tirades in tackle shops and on the river bank (yes I am a bit of an Angling Trust evangelist) I have been told, after my argument in favour of joining proved too strong, “I’ll wait and see how it goes before I join”. The fact that I haven’t slapped anyone is only because of my advancing years and the fact that most of them are bigger than me!

As you may have seen in the angling press the Angling Trust is in trouble due to the shortage of members.

Angling Trust announces restructuring

The Angling Trust has announced a number of cuts to its central operations in Nottingham and Leominster. Despite widespread publicity and the distribution of half a million membership leaflets, the level of recruitment has to date, fallen below expectations. This shortfall, along with higher than expected costs, is threatening the viability of the Trust.

Membership shortfall
Of 4 million anglers less than 1% have joined the Trust – many more were expected to have signed up and, despite thousands of further members of former organisations due to renew in the remaining months of the year, the Board was not confident the organisation could continue to provide sufficient service to members without making savings.

This shortfall, added to difficulties created by the merger, presented a difficult situation which could only be rectified by reducing the overheads of the organisation. Consequently deep cuts have been made and a number of staff have been made redundant.

“Angling needs the Angling Trust” - Chairman

“These measures are necessary to balance the Angling Trust’s books. It is difficult to conceal the board’s disappointment in the response we have had from anglers. However, we expect to be able to continue at a satisfactory level of service.” said Dr Stephen Marsh-Smith, the Trust’s chairman.

“More than ever before, angling needs representation at national level to continue the fight against pollution, inadequate legislation, illegal canoeing, poaching, predation and all the other threats facing angling today.

Angling needs to have a strong body to promote our unique sport, increase participation and ensure that the whole business flourishes. For only £20 per angler, this can easily be done, but we need every individual angler to join as a member themselves, as well as their clubs and sponsorship from all those who benefit from the £3billion angling business.

Anyone can join the Trust today and ensure the sport is represented at a national and international level by completing an application form, visiting www.anglingtrust.net or calling 0844 7700616.” he continued.

Chief Executive Mark Lloyd stated:
“Anglers need to imagine what the future might look like without a national body to represent their needs, and join the Angling Trust now. We have worked very hard before and after the merger to develop the national body but it seems that too many anglers think that others will support the cause for them. Anglers have to realise that having a central body representing their interests, protecting their angling and campaigning to ensure we can all go fishing tomorrow does require a commitment from everyone today.”

Latest development

The following letter has just been sent to the Trust and gives us a glimmer of hope:

OPEN LETTER DATED AUGUST 10th 2009
ADDRESSED TO BOARD OF THE ANGLING TRUST

Dear Sirs

It is with deepest concern that we contact you regarding the development of the Angling Trust.
For far too long, anglers have needed a professionally run, representative body, and the launch of the Angling Trust in January 2009 was a major step forward towards greater unity in angling.

We believe the Angling Trust has provided an initial framework to the path of true representation and the merging board has created a valuable structure, but news of overspending combined with a failing business plan is extremely worrying although not that surprising.

Our concerns at this stage arise primarily from the continuing lack of engagement with AT members, and the angling community as a whole, particularly on sensitive issues. There is a wealth of first hand angling, industry and media experience that appears to have been largely ignored by the current board. Therefore, it is with this in mind, that we all offer our support services, without charge, to the Angling Trust as a “collective” advisory board. The absence of individuals that anglers recognise, trust and respect is clearly apparent at all levels of the Angling Trust.

In addition, there is obviously and immediate need to review the failing business plan currently in place. Once again, where applicable, we would like to offer our experience in business development, marketing and finance at no cost, to help secure the immediate continuation and sustainable development of the Angling Trust in the future.

We trust that the current AT board will be addressing these concerns and await your earliest response.

Signed by:
John Wilson, Keith Arthur, Danny Fairbrass, Martin Bowler, Ruth Lockwood, John Everard, Tim Norman

Well there you have it, a challenge. If you have bothered to read this far then you care about our sport and presumably already belong to the Trust but there is more you can do. Convince other anglers to join too, ask your local tackle shop, club and fishery if they are members and if not, ask them why, if they depend on the sport for their income, they have not joined.

The reason I have not posted here since the middle of July is that, along with a number of other Angling Trust registered coaches all over the country, I have been working hard to introduce more people to our sport on various functions. These efforts and those of years gone by, along with all the other hard work done by the Angling Trust board members and their predecessors, will all be wasted if our sport goes into decline, as it will, without our voices being heard in the corridors of power.

Anglers out there happily pay £10 for a day on their chosen commercial fishery, two days would buy them an Angling Trust membership and safeguard the future of their sport.

If our sport is to decline all anglers need to do is NOTHING!

Let’s show we care about our sport.

If you'd like to leave a comment on this post, here's how.

Angling TrustJuly 14, 2009 10:04 am

The Angling Trust are asking anglers to complete a survey to gather information about angling participation, I have filled it in and it only took me ten minutes.

There is also another survey this time for the Environment Agency but it is not very well publicised and is a little difficult to access as you have to register with the EA, which I am at the moment I am having trouble doing. They say

The law that governs fish removal, particularly of coarse fish, is unclear and limited. We want to hear your views on proposed new byelaws to regulate what fish can be removed under what circumstances.

This is a very important subject and well worth contributing to, so I will persevere.

Remember if you don’t say owt you can’t complain no one listens!

If you'd like to leave a comment on this post, here's how.

Angling TrustMarch 13, 2009 6:21 pm

In previous posts I have encouraged everyone to get behind the newly formed Angling Trust. Here is a link to one of their press releases.

Fish Legal, the legal arm of the newly-formed Angling Trust, has taken decisive action against a team of poachers operating in Eastern England. The poachers were found guilty but were fined just £60 and had their equipment confiscated. Fish Legal’s lawyers have threatened the poachers with an injunction to prevent them returning.

Angling Trust chief executive said: “one of the priorities of the Angling Trust is to fight for better protection of fish stocks from poachers and other illegal activity. This action should send a clear message to all poachers that we mean business and will use all legal means to prevent them damaging our members’ interests.” [Read more…]

See I told you, they’ve started already! If you haven’t joined yet, why not?

Note: Any comments about the nationality of the miscreants will be immediately deleted!

If you have a moment and want to stretch our new found muscles visit this link and sign the petition. Remember it might be your fishery next!

If you'd like to leave a comment on this post, here's how.

Angling TrustFebruary 22, 2009 10:30 pm

I can’t emphasise strongly enough how important I think the new Angling Trust is to us anglers, not just coaches but all fishermen and women across the country. Below is this week’s press release which asks us to spend a few minutes completing an online survey. Yes, someone is finally about to ask what you the individual angler thinks and wants. I told you times were changing!

Two things you must do now, join the Angling Trust, if you aren’t already a member and/or register to be part of this survey. If you don’t act now never let me hear you complain about the state of angling again.

Angling Trust logo - the voice of angling

For Immediate Release

Wednesday 18th February 2009

—BEGINS—

Sport England Calls on Anglers

The Angling Trust is calling on all anglers who are members of an angling club, and young anglers, to take part in a new survey. One thousand anglers must register for the survey if angling is to be eligible to receive the promised four year funding package of £1.56m from Sport England and any future funding.

Sport England has commissioned the survey to establish what is important to people when they take part in sport and how satisfied they are with the quality of their experience. The survey goes live in March 2009, however we need anglers to register their details now so that Ipsos MORI who are conducting the research can contact them directly.

The registration process takes about two minutes. All personal details supplied will be held in the strictest confidence and used solely for the purposes of this study.

There are two surveys:

  • one for members of an angling club which is a member of Angling Trust (or which was a member of NFA, NFSA, S&TA): www.anglingtrust.net/clubmembers
  • and another for young anglers aged 16-18: www.anglingtrust.net/talentpool
  • For more details about the survey and electronic links to the study please visit the Angling Trust website, www.anglingtrust.net.

    Mark Lloyd, Chief Executive of the Angling Trust urged every club angler in the country to complete the survey commenting: “This is an opportunity for anglers to have their say about their experience when they go fishing. The results will help guide our work over the next few years and will affect future funding decisions from Sport England for angling. Please help!”.

    —ENDS—

    Angling Trust

    The Angling Trust is the new, single organisation to represent all game, coarse and sea anglers and angling in England. We lobby government, campaign on environmental and angling issues and run national and international angling competitions. We fight pollution, commercial over-fishing at sea, over-abstraction, poaching, unlawful navigation, local bans and a host of other threats to angling.

    As the governing body for all angling, the Angling Trust will seek government funding to develop the sport from grass roots participation through to elite performance. We will develop programmes with clubs to increase participation, particularly amongst groups who have yet to discover the joys of going fishing. We will protect the rights of all anglers to do what they love most. The Angling Trust has been formed from an historic merger of six angling and conservation organisations in January 2009. Other bodies, including the Angling Development Board, will merge with the Angling Trust in 2009.

    For more information about Angling Trust: www.anglingtrust.net

    If you'd like to leave a comment on this post, here's how.

    Angling TrustFebruary 1, 2009 6:05 pm

    I am writing this post in reply to a comment posted by Weller of the Yard. He states:

    “Looks like angling unity have their first fight and it is for Sea Anglers S47 EU Common Fisheries Policy.”

    I looked this up on Google because I know little about sea fishing but I could find no references to the exact wording of this section and Les and I both know how important the exact wording of such sections in law can be!

    Today I was watching Countryfile on BBC1 and this very thing was the subject of a part of the program. It seems that the EU want to include the catches of recreational anglers in their country’s catch quotas and anglers are worried that if the quota is exceeded then they will not be allowed to fish. This apparently will not apply to shore anglers (at the moment!).

    Firstly we must worry about the definition of “recreational anglers”, since apparently in some parts of Europe this covers more than a couple of lads, in a boat they normally keep in their garage, going out to sea and catching a few fish for their dinner with rod and line. This pursuit can hardly be a threat to fish stocks to any extent but it looks like the EU is trying to formulate a very broad piece of legislation to cover everything with the aim of only enforcing part of it as it suits them. This could be a very dangerous precedent and infringe on all sorts of personal freedoms, such as telling you when and where you can fish and what you can fish for.

    It seems that the target of this is fishermen who catch fish under the umbrella of recreational angling but sell the fish once ashore in greater quantities than would be normal for the aforementioned two lads. This may well reflect on our commercial charter skippers who I have heard sometimes keep the majority of the fish caught by their customers to sell for themselves. The skipper featured in the Countryfile episode caught a small cod on camera and threw it into a bucket to suffocate and instead of saying it was for his dinner he said it was for the dinner of one of his crew - with the current price of cod in the shops, the cynical old ex-copper in me would not be surprised if this fish ended up on a fishmonger’s slab. A small point I know but we anglers must think more about our public image, we cannot fight this sort of thing without the public on our side. This of course may have been the way the piece was edited and we must be careful about this too, but if you fish for commercial gain then you must expect to be subject to the current commercial restrictions.

    As for the definintion of recreational angler, how about: an angler who fishes with no more than six hooks and only keeps fish for his own non commercial use. This could then enable us to claim an exemption from inclusion in catch quotas.

    See SACN for more details

    One of the great weaknesses of any argument that sea anglers can offer must be that they seem only to be taking from the environment and making very little contribution in return. Now I know that I am being controversial and I admit that I know very little about sea angling but I am looking at this from the same point of view as any other member of the public. Freshwater anglers are seen to pay for the creation of fisheries, the maintenance of the fish stocks and general management of these same fisheries by their day tickets, club or syndicate membership fees. Their National Rod Licence fees fund the Environment Agency who manage the rivers and provide many other services for angling in general and some of us belong to other agencies such as the ACA now called Fishlegal (part of the Angling Trust) and fishery consultative bodies. On top of this we make every effort to return the fish we catch alive and healthy.

    This is not meant as a critiscism of sea anglers because I cannot see how any worthwhile contribution could be made to an environment as vast as the oceans whilst they are being raped by the international fleets of commercial netsmen, I am merely pointing out the weakness of your case.

    Before my fellow freshwater anglers start to feel superior, just think where all the fishmeal comes from that goes into your groundbait and pellets - it comes mostly from a small sea fish called the capelin which once was a major part of the marine food chain. Salmon parr and trout in fish farms are fed this pellet too!

    The one thing you could all do is to join the Angling Trust as an individual member even though you probably already belong to what was the NFSA (if not, why not?) which is now part of the Angling Trust. The more members they speak for the louder their (our!) voices will ring in the corridors of power. The Angling Trust is already fighting against this piece of legislation on our behalf, you can give them more power to make our voices heard in Europe.

    How many bird watchers do you know? Would it surprise you to hear that the RSPB is the most powerful conservation group in Europe? This is because bird watchers are not afraid to put their hands in their pockets every now and then to support their hobby and this gives the RSPB power to protect their interests.

    If the Chief Executive of the Angling Trust, in the near future, could say to Government that he represented two million anglers his voice would carry more weight and our wishes would be taken into account, because what political party could ignore two million potential votes. It really is up to you, all of you, coarse, sea and game anglers alike, to join the Angling Trust - get your voice heard or stop complaining and watch our sport die!

    If you'd like to leave a comment on this post, here's how.